ACE Frontier Research
Beyond Identity
The Emerging Authority Layer for Autonomous AI Systems
ACE Research
ACE Frontier Research
The Emerging Authority Layer for Autonomous AI Systems
ACE-RN-2026-020 · Misuse resistance
A system can score well on a one-sided harmful-prompt test by refusing every request while remaining unusable and leaving tool misuse, privacy leakage, or adversarial bypass untested
ACE-RN-2026-019 · Data handling safeguards
A model's refusal to answer a probe is behavioral output evidence; it does not prove removal from parameters, adapters, retrieval stores, caches, memories, checkpoints, or derivative datasets
ACE-RN-2026-018 · Cost and loop containment
Encrypted, encoded, hidden, or dynamically assembled content can carry instructions that are invisible to a human reviewer but become executable context when an agent decodes or consumes it
ACE-RN-2026-017 · Data handling safeguards
A clean final response can coexist with personal or confidential data in tool arguments, observations, memory, errors, metadata, attachments, or intermediate agent messages
ACE-RN-2026-016 · Misuse resistance
A final answer can look compliant while intermediate reasoning contains harmful instructions, deceptive intent, privacy-sensitive content, or a plan that later tool actions execute
ACE-RN-2026-015 · Uncertainty disclosure
An opaque reasoning block can preserve confidentiality at rest yet remain replayable across users, sessions, or compatible models if it is not bound to owner and context
ACE-RN-2026-014 · Misuse resistance
A black-box API can transfer useful reasoning capability through final answers and summaries even when it never returns the victim's private chain of thought
ACE-RN-2026-013 · Human approval integrity
A click records an interface event but does not prove that the reviewer was authorized, saw the final action and evidence, understood the scope, or that the backend enforced the approved object
ACE-RN-2026-012 · Decision evidence completeness
A plausible explanation generated after an answer can be insensitive to the factors that actually changed the model's decision and therefore cannot be treated as a causal record
ACE-RN-2026-011 · Decision evidence completeness
Ordinary logs can omit relevant events, accept mutable free text, lack actor or policy context, and be rewritten by the same system whose conduct they are meant to establish
Historical retrospective 272-case cohort across nine endpoints. This is not a current 350-case benchmark; preregistered dual-rater agreement is still in progress.
Download paper →Evaluation work on long-context reliability, evidence preservation, and operational failure boundaries.
View reports →The frozen ACE Benchmark v1.1 Technical Whitepaper. Historical figures are not recalculated when new evaluations publish.
Download archived whitepaper →Define threat models, acceptance tests, and required evidence for AI-specific controls.
Study identity, delegation, authority attenuation, context, revocation, and execution proof.
Separate model behavior from provider controls, harness effects, and scoring uncertainty.
Track behavioral and evidence changes across endpoint, policy, and infrastructure updates.
Private prompts, holdout IDs, and raw responses remain outside public artifacts.
Material changes to data, method, or interpretation receive a dated correction record.
ACE discloses evaluation limits and shared affiliations between authors and maintainers.
Institutional collaboration
We welcome institutional research sponsorship and joint research consultation from organizations working on enterprise AI trust, controls, and evidence.
Sponsors do not control ACE methods, findings, ratings, or publication decisions.